Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Where Do We Stand Now?
Vibhu K Viswanathan, Vijay K Jain
Keywords :
Biological fixation, Cement less prosthesis, Extensively porous coated stem, Revision arthroplasty, Total hip arthroplasty
Citation Information :
Viswanathan VK, Jain VK. Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Where Do We Stand Now?. Ind J Arthroplasty 2024; 1 (2):57-66.
Background: Porous coating on femoral stems is a critical feature in total hip arthroplasty (THA), which enables a secure, long-lasting and biological form of cement less fixation. The term “extensively coated” femoral stem in THA denotes a prosthesis, wherein the porous coating covers a substantial portion or even the entire surface of the implant. In this article, we comprehensively reviewed the current literature on the status of extensively porous coated femoral stem in different clinical scenarios.
Materials and methods: A detailed search was performed using the databases “Embase”, “Google Scholar”, “PubMed”, “Scopus” and “Web of Science” on August 1, 2024. Relevant manuscripts were identified using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All clinical studies, including prospective or retrospective case series, comparative or noncomparative trials, randomized and nonrandomized studies discussing the role of extensively porous coated femoral stem in primary and revision THA, were considered for inclusion. Experimental or nonclinical studies, other review articles, editorials and opinions were excluded.
Results: Overall, 9 manuscripts (6 studies on revision THA) were finally considered for the narrative review. Seven studies reported on functional outcome (patient reported outcome measures – PROM). Studies reported significant improvement in Harris hip score (HHS), satisfaction score (SF-12), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. The reported complications with extensively porous coated stems include intraoperative femur fracture, thigh pain, infections, and heterotopic ossification. Studies have reported high survivorship rates with this prosthesis (ranging between 94.5 and 99.3%), with re-revision rates between 2.7 and 5%. The radiological osteointegration has been reported to range between 94 and 100%. In addition, studies have reported radiological parameters, including stem subsidence and stress shielding rates, which have remained fairly low.
Hydroxyapatite (HA), metallic coatings (such as titanium or cobalt chrome alloys) and coatings with diverse biocompatible materials have been utilized as porous coated materials. Four generations of extensively porous coated femoral stems have been described. With each generation, more sophisticated coating techniques, improved stem geometry and incorporation of modern technological advancements (such as 3D printing, CAD-CAM technology) have been progressively included.
Conclusion: Extensively porous-coated femoral stems have remained a durable and reliable option in complex primary and revision THA surgeries. They enhance the extent of osteointegration, resulting in improved longevity and better stabilization of the cement less prosthesis. With the sophistication of porous coating techniques, and incorporation of technological advancements, these stem designs have provided a long-term benchmark for the emerging versions of revision stems.
Ozden VE, Dikmen G, Beksac B, et al. Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103(4):569–577. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.01.010.
Panchal DHC, Solanki DPB. Results of extensively coated femoral stem in revision hip replacement. Int J Orthop Sci 2020;6(4):407–411. DOI: 10.22271/ortho.2020.v6.i4f.2366.
Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Revision total hip arthroplasty: The limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;417:203–209. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000096803.78689.0c.
Hennessy DW, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS. Second-generation extensively porous-coated THA stems at minimum 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(9):2290–2296. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0831-9.
Marya SK, Thukral R. Extensively coated revision stems in proximally deficient femur: Early results in 15 patients. Indian J Orthop 2008;42(3):287–293. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.39554.
Engh CA, Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, et al. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: Minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(2):955–960. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.35794.
Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(8):839–847. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90152-2.
Wang Q, Li D, Kang P. Uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prostheses are effective in treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A retrospective mid- to long-term follow-up study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2019;27(2):2309499019857653. DOI: 10.1177/2309499019857653.
Imbuldeniya AM, Walter WK, Zicat BA, et al. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: Results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(6):730–736. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.33381.
Dagneaux L, Sculco PK, Haight HJ, et al. Extensively porous-coated stems demonstrate excellent long-term survivorship in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023;38(7S):S217–S222. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.004.
Hamilton WG, Cashen DV, Ho H, et al. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: A choice for all seasons. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(4 suppl 1):106–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.002.
Nooh A, Hart A, Tanzer M. Five- to 12-year outcomes of a short, tapered, highly porous, proximally coated cementless femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2023;38(7s):S162–S165. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.006.
Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;369:230–242. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00024.
Wallace CN, Chang JS, Kayani B, et al. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a modern extensively porous-coated femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2020;35(12):3697–3702. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.052
Alexander JS, Lombardi AV, Berend KR, et al. Minimum 25-year results of a tapered titanium porous plasma spray coated femoral component. J Arthroplasty 2023;38(9):1802–1807. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.021.
Peace WJ, Ho H, Hopper RH, et al. The outcome of extensively porous coated stems for revision total hip arthroplasty. Seminars in Arthroplasty 2011;22:112–116. DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2011.03.017.
Purcell RL, Engh CA. The removal of extensively porous-coated femoral stems. Seminars in Arthroplasty 2016;27(1):30–36. DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2016.06.032.
Kim YH, Jang YS, Park JW, et al. Combined strut onlay allografting, reduction osteotomy, and extensively porous-coated stem for reconstruction of severe femoral defects during revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021;36(11):3722–3727. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.07.011.
Epinette JA, Asencio G, Essig J, et al. Clinical results, radiological findings and survival of a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated hip ABG II stem at a minimum of ten years’ follow-up: Results of a consecutive multicentre study of 1148 hips in 1053 patients. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B(12):1610–1616. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.31167.
Kim YH, Jang YS. Clinical performance of an ultrashort, proximally porous-coated and tapered metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem among octogenarians. Orthopedics 2022;45(3):181–186. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20220128-09.
Carlson SW, Goetz DD, Liu SS, et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up of cementless total hip arthroplasty using a contemporary triple-tapered titanium stem. J Arthroplasty 2016;31(10):2231–2236. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.037.
Chen YL, Lin T, Liu A, et al. Does hydroxyapatite coating have no advantage over porous coating in primary total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2015;10:21. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0161-4.
Macheras GA, Koutsostathis SD, Galanakos SP. Cementless fully porous-coated implant-bone interface in revision total hip arthroplasty. In: Karachalios T (ed) Bone-Implant Interface in Orthopedic Surgery: Basic Science to Clinical Applications. Springer, London 2014;169–182. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5409-9_13.
Liu B, Wang H, Zhang N, et al. Femoral stems with porous lattice structures: A review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021;9:772539. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.772539.
Arabnejad S, Johnston B, Tanzer M, et al. Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2017;35(8):1774–1783. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23445.
Guo L, Ataollah Naghavi S, Wang Z, et al. On the design evolution of hip implants: A review. Materials & Design 2022;216:110552. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110552.
Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;231:7–28. PMID: 3370887.
Engh CA, Culpepper WJ. Femoral fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1997;20(9):771–773. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19970901-09.
Kronick JL, Barba ML, Paprosky WG. Extensively coated femoral components in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;344:263–274. PMID: 9372777.
Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(4 suppl 1):134–137. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.32461.
Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;257:107–128. PMID: 2199114.
Niinimäki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P. A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. International Orthopaedics 2001;25(2):85–88. DOI: 10.1007/s002640100241.
MacDonald SJ, Rosenzweig S, Guerin JS, et al. Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: A multicenter randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(2):424–432. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1092-3.
Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69(1):45–55. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.69B1.3818732.
Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;261:63–81. PMID: 2245564.
Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Brown R, et al. Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement--5- to 13-year follow-up report. Int Orthop 2000;24(2):97–100. DOI: 10.1007/s002640000115.
Park MH, Youn YH, Kang JS, et al. Long-term results of hip arthroplasty using extensive porous-coated stem-a minimum follow-up of 15 years. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2019;10:2151459319892787. DOI: 10.1177/2151459319892787.
Epinette JA, Manley MT. Uncemented stems in hip replacement--hydroxyapatite or plain porous: Does it matter? Based on a prospective study of HA Omnifit stems at 15-years minimum follow-up. Hip Int 2008;18(2):69–74. DOI: 10.1177/112070000801800201.
Tanzer M, Gollish J, Leighton R, et al. The effect of adjuvant calcium phosphate coating on a porous-coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;424:153–160. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000128282. 05708.9a.